<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>

<title>6 Things That Must Remain Distinct re. Data</title><link>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1643</link><description>Conflation is the tech industry&#39;s equivalent of macroeconomic inflation. Whenever it rears it head, we lose value courtesy of diminishing productivity.

Looking retrospectively at any technology failure -- enterprises or industry at large -- you will eventually discover -- at the core -- messy conflation of at least one of the following:


Data Model (Semantics)


Data Object (Entity) Names (Identifiers)


Data Representation Syntax (Markup)


Data Access Protocol


Data Presentation Syntax (Markup)


Data Presentation Media.



The Internet &amp;amp; World Wide Web (InterWeb) are massive successes because their respective architectural cores embody the critical separation outlined above.

The Web of Linked Data is going to become a global reality, and massive success, because it leverages inherently sound architecture -- bar conflationary distractions of RDF. :-)</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:02:32 GMT</pubDate><generator>Virtuoso Universal Server 08.03.3334</generator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kingsley Uyi Idehen</dc:creator>
<item><title>Bob Ferris</title><guid>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1643#4715</guid><link>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1643#4715</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zazi@elbklang.net</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:30:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	Why not talking about knowledge representation models? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>zazi</title><guid>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1643#4714</guid><link>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1643#4714</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zazi@elbklang.net</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:29:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	Why not talking about knowledge representation models? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item>
</channel>
</rss>
