<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>

<title>Object Relational Rediscovered?</title><link>http://www.openlinksw.com:443/blog/kidehen@openlinksw.com/blog/?id=1005</link><description>Microsoft&#39;s recent unveiling of the next generation of ADO.NET has pretty much crystalized a long running hunch that the era of standardized client/user level interfaces for &amp;quot;Object-Relational&amp;quot; technology is neigh. Finally, this application / problem domain is attracting the attention of industry behemoths such as Microsoft.
  


In an initial response to these developmentsOrri Erling, Virtuoso&#39;s Program Manager, shares valuable insights from past re. Object-Relational technology developments and deliverables challenges. As Orri notes, the Virtuoso team suspended ORM and ORDBMS work at the onset of the Kubl-Virtuoso transition due to the lack of standardized client-side functionality exposure points.

My hope is that Microsoft&#39;s efforts trigger community wide activity that result in a collection of interfaces that make scenarios such as generating .NET based Semantic Web Objects (where the S in an S-P-&amp;gt;O RDF-Triple becomes a bona fide .NET class instance generated from OWL).
To be continued since the interface specifics re. ADO.NET 3.0 remain in flux...
</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:59:15 GMT</pubDate><generator>Virtuoso Universal Server 08.03.3334</generator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kingsley Uyi Idehen</dc:creator>

</channel>
</rss>
