Details

Kingsley Uyi Idehen
Lexington, United States

Subscribe

Post Categories

Subscribe

E-Mail:

Recent Articles

Display Settings

articles per page.
order.
Data Web, Googlebase, and Yahoo!

A defining characteristic of the Data Web (Context Oriented Web 3.0) is that it facilitates Meshups rather than Mashups.

Quick Definitions:

    Mashups - Brute force joining of disparate Web Data
    Meshups - Natural joining of disparate Web Data

Reasons for the distinction:

    Mashups are Data Model oblivious.
    Meshups are Data Model driven.

Examples:

    Mashups are based on RSS 2.0 most of the time (RSS 2.0 is at best a Tree Structure that contains untyped or meaning challenged links.
    Meshups are RDF based and the data is self describing since the links are typed (posses inherent meaning thereby providing context).

So what? You may be thinking.

For starters, I can quite easily Mesh data from Googlebase (which emits RSS 2.0 or Atom) and other data sources with the Mapping Services from Yahoo!

I can achieve this in minutes without writing a single line of code. I can do it because of the Data Model prowess of RDF (self-describing instance-data), the data interchange and transformation power of XML and XSLT respectively, the inherent power of XML based Web Services (REST or SOAP), and of course, having a Hybrid Server product like Virtuoso at my disposal that delivers a cross platform solution for exploiting all of these standards coherently.

I can share the self-describing describing data source that serves my Meshup. Try reusing the data presented by a Mashup via the same URL that you used to locate Mashup to get my drift.

Demo Links:

  1. Googlebase Query URL as an RDF Data Source
  2. Perform a simple Data Mesh by adding (via link copy and paste) this Upcoming.org Query Services URL for Ajax Events to the RDF Browsers list of Data Sources (paste into the Data Source URI input field).

What does this all mean?

"Context" is the catalyst of the burgeoning Data Web (Semantic Web Layer - 1). It's the emerging appreciation of "Context" that is driving the growing desire to increment Web versions from 2.0 to 3.0. It also the the very same "Context" that has been a preoccupation of Semantic Web vision since its inception.

The journey towards a more Semantic Web is all inclusive (all "ANDs" and no "ORs" re. participation).

The Semantic Web is self-annotating. Web 2.0 has provided a huge contribution to the self annotation effort: on the Web we now have Data Spaces for Bookmarks (e.g del.icio.us), Image Galleries ( e.g Flickr), Discussion Forums (remember those comments associated with blog posts? ditto the pingbacks and trackbacks?), People Profiles (FOAF, XFN, del.icio.us, and those crumbling walled-gardens around many Social Networks), and more..

A Web without granular access to Data is simply not a Web worth having (think about the menace of click-fraud and spam).

# PermaLink Comments [0]
03/22/2007 23:04 GMT-0500 Modified: 03/22/2007 19:14 GMT-0500
Web 3.0 & Marketwatch

(Via Sramana Mitra on Strategy.)

Web 3.0 & Marketwatch. Excerpted below:

In Web 3.0, I predict, we are going to start seeing roll-ups. We will see a trunk that emerges from the Context, be it film (Netflix), music (iTunes), cooking / food, working women, single parents, … and assembles the Web 3.0 formula that addresses the whole set of needs of a consumer in that Context. Imagine:
    -I am a petite woman, dark skinned, dark haired, brown eyed. I have a distinct personal style, and only certain designers resonate with it (Context).
    -I want my personal SAKS Fifth Avenue which carries clothes by those designers, in my size (Commerce).
    -I want my personal Vogue, which covers articles about that Style, those Designers, and other emerging ones like them (Content).
    I want to exchange notes with others of my size-shape-style-psychographic and discover what else looks good. I also want the recommendation system tell me what they’re buying (Community)
    There’s also some basic principles of what looks good based on skin tone, body shape, hair color, eye color … I want the search engine to be able to filter and match based on an algorithm that builds in this knowledge base (Personalization, Vertical Search).
    Now, imagine the same for a short, fat man, who doesn’t really have a sense of what to wear. And he doesn’t have a wife or a girl-friend. Before Web 3.0, he could go to the personal shopper at Nordstrom.

With Web 3.0, the internet will be his Personal Shopper.

# PermaLink Comments [0]
03/22/2007 18:42 GMT-0500 Modified: 03/22/2007 14:33 GMT-0500
         
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso Universal Server
Running on Linux platform
The posts on this weblog are my personal views, and not those of OpenLink Software.